& Other Stories was an instant hit when it was launched by H&M in 2013. It started out with seven stores – in Barcelona, Berlin, Copenhagen, London, Milan, Paris and Stockholm – and now has over 50 stores in 13 countries.
The brand concept emerged from an internal H&M plan to launch a premium beauty brand. Sara Hildén-Bengtsson, together with colleagues Samuel Fernström, Karin Nordström and Helena Carlberg, pitched an alternative idea to create a beauty, fashion and accessories brand with a creative feel – an atelier that would allow women to curate their own personal style. Prices would sit somewhere between H&M and Cos’s and collections include staple items such as striped t-shirts and silk blouses alongside patterned dresses and trainers from Nike and Adidas.
“Everyone was talking about personal style and street style photography – this is 2010, so Instagram didn’t even exist back then,” says Hildén-Bengtsson. “We went back to our decision makers and said ‘we think we should do something about personal style’.”
The business was hesitant at first. “They said, ‘It looks exactly the same as H&M – you say you’re going to do beauty and shoes and ready to wear and accessories’ and we said ‘we know, but it will be founded in 2013 so believe us, it’s going to be different’. They said, ‘OK, let’s do it’ and that’s how it all got started,” she continues.
“Then we were only five people working with the project and I must say, I think the H&M group was really brave to start new brands and do new developments like this. They dare to do new things. Of course, they have the muscles as well, but I think they’re very exciting in that way.”
Hildén-Bengtsson studied graphic design and advertising at Sweden’s Forsbergs Skola and communications at the Royal College of Art. She joined the H&M group’s special projects team in 2007 after working at Neville Brody Associates and on creative projects for Kenzo and Liberty.
As creative director of the new concept, she worked with a small team to establish the brand’s tone of voice and its visual identity. From the outset, it has always felt more like a boutique label than a global brand owned by one of the world’s biggest retailers. Indeed its creative team operates independently from the H&M group, there is no clue of parentage in the store, and everything from photoshoots to clothing and creative campaigns are conceived in-house. The team occasionally collaborates with external agencies (it worked with Made Thought to create packaging) but oversees all of the brand’s creative output.
“We all talked about the fact that we are happiest when we are in the studio working and that is where everything gets done – from the collections to the packaging for the beauty, all the art direction, photo shoots, everything is happening with the studio and everything is fitting together,” says Hildén-Bengtsson.
“It’s almost like going back to the Royal College in a way with all of the different fields working together … there’s a lot of different disciplines and they all need to work together to make the brand as coherent as possible, and I think that’s the beauty of it. That’s kind of the heart of the whole story [and] the idea of the atelier needed to be reflected within the store. If you go into & Other Stories, it should feel almost like a pop-up shop. It has that creative vibe to it, you have that feeling of, ‘I’ve just been to a creative space’…. The online shop obviously needed to reflect that, so it’s almost like a digital mood board that you go to for inspiration.”
& Other Stories launches a handful of new collections each season. Each collection or ‘story’ is inspired by a different city and showcased in films and photo stories on its website and social channels. The brand regularly launches ‘co-labs’ with creatives and retailers – it has created capsule collections with Rodarte and singer Lykke Li as well as shoe brand Toms and Central Saint Martins graduate Sadie Williams. The choice of collaborators is diverse and often surprising.
“We did a collaboration with Sadie Williams when she was almost straight out of Central Saint Martins – we just thought her degree show was fantastic – so it has been collaborations at all kinds of levels,” says Hildén-Bengtsson.
The brand also aims to continually surprise audiences with its advertising and celebrate individuals with their own distinct style. The lack of diversity remains a major issue in fashion but & Other Stories has been more inclusive than most when it comes to campaigns: for AW15 it launched a campaign starring trans models Hari Nef and Valentijn de Hingh and shot by trans photographer Amos Mac. The following year, it launched a Valentine’s Day campaign featuring a same sex couple and in 2014, teamed up with nonagenarian style icon Iris Apfel.
The brand’s films range from stop-motion shorts to a humorous tale directed by Wendy McColm and starring French model Jeanne Damas. The film pokes fun at the way women are often represented in fashion films with Damas presented as a self-indulgent bohemian. It also teamed up with Lena Dunham to create a short promoting a co-lab by designer Rachel Antonoff.
& Other Stories’ success is based not just on its clothes and unexpected collaborations but the attention to detail that runs through every aspect of the customer experience – from packaging to store design. In store, a pop-up feel is created with concrete floors, exposed lighting and clothes displayed on moveable racks and shelving units. “We have got good feedback from people saying that they felt when they went into the store, you could see there was a lot of love put into everything that was done,” says Hildén-Bengtsson.
The brand’s stripped back website features some lovely imagery and its Instagram feed offers a behind-the-scenes look at the atelier as well as close-ups of store displays and product shots. It also regrams customers’ posts, creating a feed with a personal, intimate feel. It produces bespoke content for different platforms but the same aesthetic and tone of voice runs throughout all of & Other Stories’ communications.
“I think customers don’t always remember or care about if they’ve seen something on Instagram or on Facebook or in a store … they just see that as the brand voice coming out and I just think it’s so important for everything to be as coherent as possible,” says Hildén-Bengtsson.
“That doesn’t mean that everything has to be exactly the same, but it should feel like it’s the same brand and the same voice coming through, so you feel that you trust the brand and you feel love for it or you feel excited about it – that you have some kind of connection to that brand. I hope that’s what we were able to create with & Other Stories.”
After six years at & Other Stories, Hildén-Bengtsson has left the brand to set up a new creative studio, Open. “I love the startup phase. I’m that kind of person that loves creating concepts and new brands,” she says. “I stayed for almost seven years. That’s a long time for someone who has this type of mindset but that’s because I’m totally in love with the brand and all the fantastic people that work with it so for me, I needed to be challenged again, and scared and thrilled and so on.”
As Hildén-Bengtsson notes, the retail experience has changed dramatically in the past few years. Brands are being more creative online – whether through their use of social media or creating more dynamic websites – but now face the challenge of enticing customers into physical stores when it’s often quicker and easier to shop online. The shops that are thriving are those who can offer something extra – whether it’s in-store stylists and beauty bars or florists and cafes. “I think we’re going to see a boom in the whole experience design or communication [design] in stores because they need to find their reason for being,” she says.
Online or off, the key to engaging with consumers is of course, devising compelling experiences that feel genuine and distinctive. “I think you have to be really good at storytelling – telling your story, why you exist on the market, what you are selling and why customers should choose to love this brand instead of another,” says Hildén-Bengtsson.
“There is so much information and so much going on now that people are very clever and they will only connect with things that are real so I think that’s the lesson now – to really tell all the great things that you do with the brand and why you’re doing them and how you do it and be clear in your communications.”
In the beginning, it was “Let’s disrupt the mattress industry. It’s broken.” That quickly morphed into “Let’s invent an industry around sleep” … Co-founder and COO Neil Parikh’s father is a sleep doctor, and he went to a year of medical school. The mattress industry was a mess. You walk into a store expecting a confusing experience, but you don’t expect the 35 models offered to be basically the same product with different labels. It’s worse than buying a used car–at least there you have data points like horsepower, air conditioning, and a Carfax report. But who knows how many springs are good for you?
Parikh retells the story: “After eight months of testing hundreds of mattress types, we learned that people need similar things, like back support, so we decided to make one mattress. Memory foam is super supportive, but it gets hot and it’s not very bouncy, so we added a layer of open-cell latex foam, which keeps you cool and adds just the right bounce. We’re the first company to put memory foam and latex together and have a patent pending.
Luke Sherwin, Casper’s chief creative officer and one of our co-founders, and I lived in a fourth-floor walkup and realized there was no way to get a queen-size bed up our stairs easily. We said, “What if we could compress a mattress to fit into a box the size of a dorm refrigerator?” This way, we can deliver it via UPS so it costs us a 10th of the price to ship. Plus, people can test the mattress in their homes. You have 100 days to try our mattress. If you don’t like it, we’ll come get it for free. Now, a few companies do this, but not long ago most stores required a several-hundred-dollar restocking fee.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYcYcig7-As
Early on, a couple made a YouTube video about how our bed wasn’t exactly right for them but the experience was amazing. That is the goal. Those customers are still going to talk positively about our company and might even buy our sheets and pillows. Our return rate is low, and we try to donate those mattresses to a local charity, which is more cost-effective than taking them back halfway across the country to refurbish and resell.
People usually buy a mattress about every eight to 10 years. Most companies don’t care who you are–they’ve made their sale. For us, that’s the start of a long-term relationship. Half of our customers talk to someone in-house. The questions are technical, as in “Do I need a box spring?” (No.) “Does it work on this type of bed frame?” (Yes.) We use every conversation to learn something about the customer. We know how long you’ve had your bed, and if you have kids or a pet. We keep track of all that, and then send people anniversary gifts, or dog beds. It’s not about just selling you a bed. It’s “How do I make this person our biggest advocate?”
Casper Labs came from that customer database. We have 15,000 customers who are part of our product-development process. They come to events, and test prototypes. Many are obsessive about sleep. They send us sleep tracker data and say, “I tested this product versus this one, and here’s what I found.” That process has helped us build a group of evangelists.
We consider ourselves a tech company first. We’ve created software that lets us know exactly where our raw materials and mattress components are and how to forecast what and when to build. If the UPS truck is delayed, we can reach out to the customer and say, “Hey, we’ve been tracking your order and noticed something has gone awry.” If you’ve bought a mattress, instead of having to find your order number, our customer-care expert knows who you are without even asking.
By selling directly to customers, we don’t have the same cost structure. We thought about how much we needed to spend on the materials as well as service and returns. There’s a psychological barrier around $1,000, and most people spend $500 on their first bed. We had to be affordable enough so they could feel that they could reach up.
There are many more ways to create an ideal sleep environment. The day after we launched, we started working on pillows and sheets. We questioned how both are produced and then made prototypes. We tried 100 different densities of materials for pillows, including buckwheat, and had customers try many of them. It took 16 months to come up with one pillow that works for everyone. We did a similar process with our sheets and found most people want them to breathe well and last a long time. We’ve been taught to believe that 1,000-thread-count hotel collection sheets are what everyone wants. It turns out, the more threads, the more filler fiber, which means the sheets are going to sleep really hot. Our perfect balance is 90 threads one way, 110 the other. We haven’t decided what the next product is. Customers have asked for everything from lights to sleep trackers. But we do know the category is enormous.
Whole Foods helped shape the healthy-foods movement. We want to do the same for sleep.
While still small, direct-to-consumer mattress startups like Casper are keeping the sleep giants up at night. Mattress Firm, which in November announced it would acquire Sleepy’s, making it the largest U.S. mattress chain, has launched an online bed-in-a-box arm called Dream Bed, and it’s not the only incumbent to pull a copycat move. Given that in 2014 some 35 million people bought mattresses in just the U.S., many potential converts remain.
Momondo’s vision is of a world where our differences are a source of inspiration and development, not intolerance and prejudice. Its purpose is to give courage and encourage each one of us to stay curious and be open-minded so we can all enjoy a better, more diversified world.
To do this, the search engine has focused on rich, inspiring, human content. Telling great stories of people and their adventures across the world, inspiring people to “stay curious”, to explore and go further. In 2016, this content became remarkable with a project exploring how connected we all are to the world. At a time of social polarisation across the world, it reminded people that we are all citizens of the world.
The “DNA Journey” video campaign has been viewed more than 28 million times on their Facebook page, viewed more than five million times on their YouTube channel, shared more than 600,000 times globally and commented on by thousands of people from all over the world. 169,631 people entered our The DNA Journey competition with the hope of winning their very own DNA Journey (the competition is now closed).
What is the purpose of The DNA Journey?
The purpose of The DNA Journey campaign is to show that we, as people, have more things uniting us than dividing us. The DNA Journey is part of momondo’s overall vision of a more open and tolerant world. You can read more about momondo’s vision and ongoing activities here: letsopenourworld.com.
How were the participants found?
As is the case with many campaign films, we employed casting agencies to help us find participants. Specifically, we used two agencies. These two agencies sourced participants via their extras databases, their own networks and via online forums. In the process of selecting the participants, momondo was presented with their ethnicity and family history only.
The casting agencies filmed 67 people talking about themselves and where they come from for 10 minutes each. After this, they were asked to take a saliva DNA test. Based on these results, together with the participants’ personal stories, we selected 16 for the shoot in Copenhagen. The criteria we looked at were their ancestry, their perception of themselves and the world, and if there was a surprise element in their DNA results.
Are there actors in the video?
The participants of The DNA Journey appear in their own name and receive their own DNA results. Neither their occupation nor their educational background had any bearing upon their selection.
Participants came from all walks of life and all kinds of occupations. Examples of the participants’ occupations are: secretary, dog trainer, actor, account manager and model. We did not carry out specific research into what kind of profession the participants had – or have had – as they would be appearing as themselves.
However, because of the great interest in the participants’ possible acting experience, we have since investigated how many have more or less experience acting or appearing as extras before. This applies to 10 of the participants. The only professional actress purposely cast was the role of the female interviewer. The background audience was bolstered with extras whom we did not DNA test.
Were the film’s participants told how to react to their DNA tests?
The participants in the film were not cast to act, and what they say in the film are their own words and thoughts. They were interviewed about their personal relationship to their ancestry and nationality, and later shown the result of the DNA analysis that was made a few weeks earlier.
Before the reveal of the DNA results, the contestants were very excited about their results and we talked with them about the fact that they were welcome to express this in the film. The participants were not directed individually in how to react or what to say about their DNA results.
Did the participants receive payment for their appearance?
As is normal practice in the production of an advertisement, participants were paid for both their appearance and rights.
How was the advertisement shot?
The campaign film was shot in a music venue, Vega, in Copenhagen from April 6th to April 8th 2016. While an intertitle in the film states, “Two weeks later”, all of the participants carried out their DNA test before the shoot. This is a modification we made for the sake of storytelling. Similarly, the spitting scenes were shot when the entire crew was together in Copenhagen for logistical reasons. During the shoot, participants were first interviewed about their views on their own nationality and other nations, and then presented with the results of their DNA test.
Were there any retakes in the film?
Yes. When a campaign film is shot, there can be multiple reasons for retakes, such as problems with the sound, an unclear image, people mumbling or the lighting being wrong. The important thing for us was to capture the spontaneous reactions when participants saw their DNA results for the first time. The participants only opened the envelope once and the film contains the reactions from that take. This is also why we used four cameras to ensure that we captured the reaction on film.
Is the story about two participants being related real?
Yes, the story is real and they were both overwhelmed when they found each other. We think it is a good story and they both shared it with their families after the shoot. The two participants are distant cousins. When you test your DNA with AncestryDNA, our partner for this campaign, you can check whether or not there are any distant cousins registered in AncestryDNA’s database. It was a pure coincidence that two out of the 67 people tested were related.
Who conducted the DNA tests in the film?
AncestryDNA carried out the tests. In the test you learn about your DNA based on 26 regions worldwide. AncestryDNA gives ethnicity estimates that map back to broad geographical regions, often including one or more countries.
AncestryDNA was able to provide each participant with a more detailed DNA map than the average taker of their DNA test, because the participant selection process had provided them with a greater understanding of each participant’s family history, surname and ancestral background.
How have the participants felt since the film was shot?
Many people have asked what reactions the participants have had since the shoot. Here are three participants’ testimonials.
‘Thank you so much for the amazing opportunity to be a part of your project. It was one of the most incredible experiences of my life. I am so grateful to have lived that experience, grateful for the way it changed me and how it is shaping my work as an artist today. Grateful for the journey into myself and for seeing others uncovering their beautiful journeys while carrying a bit of my own. I feel invincible, ageless and ready to face what the future holds.’
‘It was a profoundly emotional experience, and made me question who I am and who I thought I was. My family and friends were inspired by my journey, and loved the idea behind the campaign! Many of them are now desperate to undergo their own tests to discover their origins.’
‘I feel eager, impatient, excited, motivated, grateful, surprised, overwhelmed and filled with beautiful energy after the experience we’ve lived together in the studio.’
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G84LJ5wkYJo
The minibus crosses the vast plateau on a newly paved road. Cracked fields stretch away towards the Moroccan desert to the south. Yet the barren landscape is no longer quite as desolate as it once was. This year it became home to one of the world’s biggest solar power plants.
Hundreds of curved mirrors, each as big as a bus, are ranked in rows covering 1,400,000 sq m (15m sq ft) of desert, an area the size of 200 football fields. The massive complex sits on a sun-blasted site at the foot of the High Atlas mountains, 10km (6 miles) from Ouarzazate – a city nicknamed the door to the desert. With around 330 days of sunshine a year, it’s an ideal location.
As well as meeting domestic needs, Morocco hopes one day to export solar energy to Europe. This is a plant that could help define Africa’s – and the world’s – energy future.
Of course, on the day I visit the sky is covered in clouds. “No electricity will be produced today,“ says Rachid Bayed at the Moroccan Agency for Solar Energy (Masen), which is responsible for implementing the flagship project.
An occasional off day is not a concern, however. After many years of false starts, solar power is coming of age as countries in the sun finally embrace their most abundant source of clean energy. The Moroccan site is one of several across Africa and similar plants are being built in the Middle East – in Jordan, Dubai and Saudi Arabia. The falling cost of solar power has made it a viable alternative to oil even in the most oil-rich parts of the world.
Noor 1, the first phase of the Moroccan plant, has already surpassed expectations in terms of the amount of energy it has produced. It is an encouraging result in line with Morocco’s goal to reduce its fossil fuel bill by focusing on renewables while still meeting growing energy needs that are increasing by about 7% per year. Morocco’s stable government and economy has helped it secure funding: the European Union contributed 60% of the cost for the Ouarzazate project, for example.
The country plans to generate 14% of its energy from solar by 2020 and by adding other renewable sources like wind and water into the mix, it is aiming to produce 52% of its own energy by 2030. This puts Morocco more or less in line with countries like the UK, which wants to generate 30% of its electricity from renewables by the end of the decade, and the US, where President Obama set a target of 20% by 2030. (Trump has threatened to dump renewables, but his actions may not have a huge impact. Many policies are controlled by individual states and big companies have already started to switch to cleaner and cheaper alternatives.)
Due to the lack sun on the day I visit, the hundreds of mirrors stand still and silent. The team keeps a close eye on weather forecasts to predict output for the following day, allowing other sources of energy to take over when it is overcast.
But normally the reflectors can be heard as they move together to follow the Sun like a giant field of sunflowers. The mirrors focus the Sun’s energy onto a synthetic oil that flows through a network of pipes. Reaching temperatures up to 350C (662F), the hot oil is used to produce high-pressure water vapour that drives a turbine-powered generator. “It’s the same classic process used with fossil fuels, except that we are using the Sun’s heat as the source,” says Bayed.
The plant keeps generating energy after sunset, when electricity demands peak. Some of the day’s energy is stored in reservoirs of superhot molten salts made of sodium and potassium nitrates, which keeps production going for up to three hours. In the next phase of the plant, production will continue for up to eight hours after sunset.
As well as boosting Morocco’s power production, the Ouarzazate project is helping the local economy. Around 2,000 workers were hired during the initial two years of construction, many of them Moroccan. Roads built to provide access to the plant have also connected nearby villages, helping children get to school. Water brought in for the site has been piped beyond the complex, hooking up 33 villages to the water grid.
Masen has also helped farmers in the area by teaching them sustainable practices. Heading towards the mountains, I visit the Berber village of Asseghmou, 30 miles (48 kilometres) north of Ouarzazate, where a small farm has now changed the way it raises ewes. Most farmers here rely on their intuition alone but they are being introduced to more reliable techniques -such as simply separating animals in their pens – which are improving yields. Masen also provided 25 farms with sheep for breeding purposes. “I now have better food security,” says Chaoui, who runs a local farm. And his almond tree is thriving thanks to cultivation tips.
Even so, some locals have concerns. Abdellatif, who lives in the city of Zagora about 75 miles (120 kilometres) further south, where there are high rates of unemployment, thinks that the plant should focus on creating permanent jobs. He has friends who were hired to work there but they were only on contract for a few months. Once fully operational, the station will only require about 50 to 100 employees so the job boom may end. “The components of the plant are manufactured abroad but it would be better to produce them locally to generate ongoing work for residents,” he says.
A bigger issue is that the solar plant draws a massive amount of water for cleaning and cooling from the local El Mansour Eddahbi dam. In recent years, water scarcity has been a problem in the semi-desert region and there are water cuts. Agricultural land further south in the Draa valley depends on water from the dam, which is occasionally released into the otherwise-dry river. But Mustapha Sellam, the site manager, claims that the water used by the complex amounts to 0.5% of the dam’s supply, which is negligible compared to its capacity.
Still, the plant’s consumption is enough to make a difference to struggling farmers. So the plant is making improvements to reduce the amount of water it uses. Instead of relying on water to clean the mirrors, pressurised air is used. And whereas Noor 1 uses water to cool the steam produced by the generators, so that it can be turned back into water and reused to produce more electricity, a dry cooling system that uses air will be installed.
These new sections of the plant are currently being built. Noor 2 will be similar to the first phase, but Noor 3 will experiment with a different design. Instead of ranks of mirrors it will capture and store the Sun’s energy with a single large tower, which is thought to be more efficient.
Seven thousand flat mirrors surrounding the tower will all track and reflect the sun’s rays towards a receiver at the top, requiring much less space than existing arrangement of mirrors. Molten salts filling the interior of the tower will capture and store heat directly, doing away with the need for hot oil.
Similar systems are already used in South Africa, Spain and a few sites in the US, such as California’s Mojave desert and Nevada. But at 86ft (26m) tall, Ouarzazate’s recently erected structure is the highest of its kind in the world.
Other plants in Morocco are already underway. Next year construction will begin at two sites in the south-west, near Laayoune and Boujdour, with plants near Tata and Midelt to follow.
The success of these plants in Morocco – and those in South Africa – may encourage other African countries to turn to solar power. South Africa is already one of the world’s top 10 producers of solar power and Rwanda is home to east Africa’s first solar plant, which opened in 2014. Large plants are being planned for Ghana and Uganda.
Africa’s sunshine could eventually make the continent a supplier of energy to the rest of the world. Sellam has high hopes for Noor. “Our main goal is to become energy-independent but if one day we are producing a surplus we could supply other countries too,” he says. Imagine recharging your electric car in Berlin with electricity produced in Morocco.
With the clouds set to lift in Ouarzazate, Africa is busy planning for a sunny day.
Warby Parker is a lifestyle brand with the goal to offer designer eyewear at a revolutionary price while leading the way for socially conscious businesses. By engaging directly with consumers, they’re able to offer ultra-high-quality, vintage-inspired frames for $95 including prescription lenses and shipping. Social innovation is woven into the DNA of our company, and for every pair of glasses purchased, a pair is distributed to someone in need. In 2015, Fast Company named them the #1 Most Innovative Company. We’re also a certified B Corporation, which means that we are held to the highest standards of social and environmental performance.
The brand story continues … “It turns out there was a simple explanation. The eyewear industry is dominated by a single company that has been able to keep prices artificially high while reaping huge profits from consumers who have no other options. We started Warby Parker to create an alternative. By circumventing traditional channels, designing glasses in-house, and engaging with customers directly, we’re able to provide higher-quality, better-looking prescription eyewear at a fraction of the going price.
We believe that buying glasses should be easy and fun. It should leave you happy and good-looking, with money in your pocket. We also believe that everyone has the right to see. Almost one billion people worldwide lack access to glasses, which means that 15% of the world’s population cannot effectively learn or work. To help address this problem, Warby Parker partners with non-profits like VisionSpring to ensure that for every pair of glasses sold, a pair is distributed to someone in need. There’s nothing complicated about it. Good eyewear, good outcome.”
Extract from a recent Forbes article:
Warby Parker was founded in 2010, by four friends, Neil Blumenthal, Dave Gilboa, Andy Hunt and Jeff Raider, who happened to be in business school.
The inception of the idea had taken place in a computer lab, as the four friends lamented the state of the eyeglass industry. Why are glasses so expensive?
The first Eureka moment came when investigating that very question. Dave describes: “Understanding that the same company owned LensCrafters and Pearle Vision, Ray-Ban and Oakley, and the licenses for Chanel or Prada prescription frames and sunglasses — all of a sudden, it made sense to me why glasses were so expensive.”
And with that epiphany, the idea began to take shape and the business model was born. They would create a vertically integrated company. Neil explains, “It was really about bypassing retailers, bypassing the middlemen that would mark up lenses 3-5x what they cost, so we could just transfer all of that cost directly to consumers and save them money.”
If you think that’s a mouthful, that’s just the beginning: “When you buy a Ralp Lauren -0.42% or Chanel pair of glasses, it’s actually a company called Luxottica that’s designing them and paying a licensing fee between 10 and 15% to that brand to slap that logo on there. If we did our own brand, we could give that 10-15% back to customers.”
Even with all this thought out, it still wasn’t clear what would come of the idea. As Dave Gilboa, Warby Parker’s future co-CEO, put it: “Warby Parker wasn’t the basket that I wanted to put all my eggs into.” And Neil Blumenthal, the other future co-CEO, felt no differently: “In some respects, my time in business school, I was sort of hedging my bets between 1) Would be Warby Parker take off in the startup world, or 2) Would I have an offer after [graduation.]”
After incubating the idea for a year and a half, the idea finally hatched. The launch was so successful that the team hit their first year sales targets in the first three weeks. That’s like expecting one child and instead landing with triplets.
The biggest benefit of good branding is, of course, brand loyalty. Ries writes in Positioning: “History shows that the first brand into the brain, on the average, gets twice the long-term market share of the No. 2 brand and twice again as much as the No. 3 brand.”
But being first in the brain is still only the first step. “You build brand loyalty […] the same way you build mate loyalty in a marriage. You get there first and then be careful not to give them a reason to switch.”
Soon after Warby Parker’s success, copy-cats began cropping up. But what none of these copy-cats understood was Warby Parker already occupied the No. 1 spot in the customer’s mind, and to date, had done everything in their power to keep those customers. Al Ries explains this phenomenon: “Moving up the ladder in the mind can be extremely difficult if the brands above have a strong foothold and no leverage or positioning strategy is applied.”
“What dethrones a leader, of course, is change.” As Al Ries points out, “To play the game successfully, you must make decisions on what your company will be doing not next month or next year but in 5 years, 10 years.”
The question: Can Warby Parker keep its lead?
“We’re often asked why Warby has been successful. If we sum it up in one word, it’s deliberate,” Dave says. Their passion for the idea has helped drive that meticulous mindset.
But contrary to popular belief, working harder is not what leads to success. As Al Ries writes, “The only sure way to success is to find yourself a horse to ride. It may be difficult for the ego to accept, but success in life is based more on what others can do for you than on what you can do for yourself.”
Warby Parker has built its brand to build relationships. It allows them to build meaningful relationships because it’s a brand that cares. It cares about the world, it cares about its people and it cares about its customers.
So much of success is serendipitous. And the key to serendipity is increasing the chances for a serendipitous encounter. The more relationships you build, the odds swing in your favor that that one of those relationships will help you succeed down the line that one time you need it.
Tim Riley explains Warby Parker’s marketing tactics
Here is an interesting talk by Tim Riley who heads up the online experience at Warby Parker. His job is to make the process of buying glasses online as fun and easy as possible:
Here are 7 things to take away from Tim’s talk, which is also transcribed below:
- Make Me Care … Start by putting together a fundamentally great story. Warby Parker got tremendous word-of-mouth from the get-go because their story resonated with the press, who were eager to tell their readers about it. This should work for all brands, but it should be especially powerful for lifestyle brands. (Read: It was a dark and stormy night… – 11 Examples of Storytelling in Marketing)
- Understand your brand hierarchy … What’s most critical? Warby Parker lays out its brand in a linear fashion: Lifestyle brand -> Value and Service -> Social Mission. Rather than trying to do everything at once, they focused on the most important fundamentals that would enable them to do what they really wanted to do. (Read: 30 Tips To Build Your Personal Brand From 37 Experts [Infographic])
- Steal the show! … Get your early buzz + influencer buy-in by being tastefully rebellious. Warby Parker wanted to be a part of NY Fashion Week in Fall 2011, but couldn’t afford to get involved the traditional way- so they invited 40+ editors to a ‘secret event’ at the NY Public Library. They earned buzz (without paying for it!) by creating a remarkable experience. (Read: Guerrilla Marketing Tactics Every Startup Should Know: 8 Case Studies and Examples)
- If It Ain’t Fun, Why Do It … Create content that’s legitimately fun. Warby Parker’s annual reports include things like what bagels they ate, or what were the most popular misspellings of the brand. In 2012, this led to their 3 highest consecutive sales days of the year. (Warby Barker became a standalone April Fool’s site, which got 2.5x the traffic of the actual site.) If you’re not enjoying your own content, why would anybody else?
- Figure out ways to turn mundane interactions with your brand into remarkable, social ones. Warby Parker’s team responded to questions on Twitter with quickly-shot YouTube videos, which average 120 views per video. They also provided a make-a-snowman kit with their gift cards, and added a #WarbySnowman hashtag– turning it into a fun, remarkable experience. (Read: 17 Ways That 15 Companies Got Massive Word-of-Mouth By Delighting Their Customers)
- Better Together … Partnerships make tonnes of sense for lifestyle brands. Warby Parker does partnerships with all sorts of other brands and entities. Ghostly International (music label), Man Of Steel movie (Clarke Kent as the original do-gooder and most famous glasses-wearer), DonorsChoose.org, (in line with social mission, $30 gift card allows customers to get more directly involved with projects). (Read: Examples Of Collaboration In Ecommerce – Win-Wins For Everybody)
- Create unique, memorable physical experiences. Warby Parker makes very interesting decisions: The flagship store looks like a library, and the eye exams are done with old-school railroad flipping things. When they wanted to do mobile showcases, they used bicycles, and then a repurposed schoolbus. Their first showcase had a Yurt in it. Every time they had a chance, they chose to do something unorthodox.
“Nespresso. What else?” ask George Clooney, as if you were to question his taste in coffee. In 1976, Eric Favre of Switzerland’s largest business, Nestle, invented the Nespresso system. 10 years later, Nestle remembered that it was the coffee that people really wanted, not just a great machine. It licensed out manufacturing of the hardware and created “Le Club”.
Whilst the machines are now made by others, from Alessi to Krups, the coffee is made by Nestle, with drinkers subscribing to pod refills sent directly to their homes. Over the decades, coffee culture came to dominate our towns, and people demanded better at home. Nestle, as Nespresso, was waiting.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5QdLFip8iU&list=PLQ2eIUsAVWUyoz0kY_nbMg3xUjYBjqrxF&index=3
Nespresso’s success lies in two factors – its business model, and its market strategy. The low cost machines and premium coffee is an echo of the “shaver and blades” model used so successfully by Gillette, whilst the direct to consumer channel allows the brand to build a deep understanding and relationship with its drinkers.
Nestle targeted two primary markets for growth – USA and China. However it realised it would need different strategies from what had worked in Europe. In the USA, Nespresso sought to differentiate itself by targeting women, with a more sophisticated approach, endorsed by Penelope Cruz. In China, growth is slower, taking time for people to consider the alternative to tea. Slow, but huge potential. But Nestle is playing a long-term game. “Relax, it will happen” as Clooney might say.
Read the Nespresso history: simple idea to brand experience
A snowboarder glides up-side down over a forest of trees and sticks his hand out to brush the top of a tall pine. He does it so casually, whilst a high-speed camera catches the treetop moment, just another glimpse of Red Bull action. In fact you might be forgetting that Red Bull is actually a drink. The logo is everywhere at these events, but the brand is more than an energy drink.
“Red Bull gives you wings” says the slogan, emblazoned across the sky by stunt aircraft taking part in the brand’s Air Race in front of millions of spectators crowded along the banks of the Danube in Budapest. It’s the same message at the Flugtag, when homemade aircraft take flight and flop just a quickly, of the Cliff diving, from the tall buildings into Boston Harbor, or the Soapbox race, when rickety go-karts hurtle down a mountain side. It’s all pure adrenalin, and fabulous entertainment.
In 1987 Dietrich Mateschitz was in Bangkok selling photocopiers. After a long flight he collapsed into the chair of a hotel bar. “I know exactly what you need, Sir” proposed the Thai waitress. She quickly returned with a glass of Krating Daeng (daeng means red, krating is a guar, or very large bison). Whilst the original ingredients were said to contain bull’s testicles, Mateschitz was soon energising, returning to his native Austria with a plan to modify the recipe, and launch his new brand.
Having sold 6 billion cans, the world’s largest energy drink is often called “liquid cocaine”. But the focus is not the ingredients, it’s the possibilities of the brand – how it makes you feel, not what it is. This is where the high adrenalin sports come in. Red Bull Media House makes the movies of each event, on a budget of around $2 million, but sells the movies for much more. There are a regular NBC reality TV shows featuring its stars, online communities, and Red Bulletin magazine. In fact such content is as important as the product in building the brand, so much so that Mateschitz now calls Red Bull a media company.
“At WeWork, we are committed to creating a world where people can do what they love, where they can create a life’s work and not just a living,” said Adam Neumann, WeWork’s co-founder and CEO.
WeWork began as a simple co-working space for artists, entrepreneurs, and freelancers. It has rapidly expanded to more than 150 locations in 15 countries worldwide. In 2016, the business raised $690 million at a valuation of nearly $17 billion. It charges members a subscription fee.
“When we started WeWork in 2010, we wanted to build more than beautiful, shared office spaces. We wanted to build a community. A place you join as an individual, ‘me’, but where you become part of a greater ‘we’. A place where we’re redefining success measured by personal fulfillment, not just the bottom line. Community is our catalyst.” says Neumann.
WeWork’s workspace design features private offices (for teams of 1–100+) with glass walls to maintain privacy without sacrificing transparency or natural light. Common spaces have a distinct aesthetic and vibe that will inspire your team, as well as the guests you bring into our buildings.
Typical features of a workspace include
- Super-fast Internet. Hard-wired (Ethernet) connections as well as access to Wi-Fi in all WeWork locations.
- Spacious, Unique Common Areas. WeWork spaces includes desks, chairs, desk lamps, and lockable filing cabinets.
- Business-Class Printers. Each WeWork floor has at least one multi-function copier/scanner/printer.
- Free Refreshments. Get free micro-roasted coffee, tea, fruit water, and beer at every WeWork location.
- Onsite Staff, and managers available from 9am-5pm, Mon-Fri.
- Private Phone Booths. Phone booths are available on all floors for private calls.
Events are an essential part of the WeWork experience. From regularly scheduled office hours with venture capitalists or other industry professionals, to tequila tasting happy hours with the whole community, we know how to work, and we know how to have fun. There are events, both social and professional, happening every day to help you build and maintain a strong team culture.
Here is an extract from a Forbes magazine profile:
Mort Zuckerman, the 77 year old billionaire chairman of Boston Properties, controls $19.6 billion (market cap) worth of prime office buildings in cities like New York, Washington and San Francisco, and in June 2013 he took a walk through a little real estate business called WeWork that Adam Neumann and his partner, Miguel McKelvey, were building.
Neumann, then a 34-year-old former Israeli naval officer with a thick mane of black hair, met Zuckerman at the elevator of his second WeWork office in New York’s SoHo neighborhood. “Surprise, surprise–another upstart wanted in on the office rental game,” Zuckerman remembers thinking to himself. Neumann explained the business model: WeWork takes out a cut-rate lease on a floor or two of an office building, chops it up into smaller parcels and then charges monthly memberships to startups and small companies that want to work cheek-by-jowl with each other.
Neumann led Zuckerman past WeWork’s 38,000-square-foot warren of small, glassed-in offices packed with young creative-economy types, the coffee lounge that converts into a beer-and-wine event space during happy hour, the conference rooms brimming with videoconferencing gear and the office managers smiling and taking care of package deliveries and replenishing the free coffee and laser printers. “We’ve got a waiting list months long,” Neumann told him. And the buzz in the air was going to be repeated across seven cities in a dozen new locations before 2015.
Zuckerman warmed up. Here were dozens of members with needs very different from the tenants who sign leases at Boston Properties buildings on Park Avenue. These startups need each other. They feed off each other. They want to belong to something. “Adam understood in a very serious way that we are in a new culture,” Zuckerman says. “I found it extraordinarily creative and original after being in this business for God knows how many years.” (actually, it’s around 50 years!)
Zuckerman asked Neumann to lunch. Then another. By their fourth meeting he made Neumann promise to let him invest personally in WeWork the next time it raised money. And in 2015, almost two years since that first tour, a 200,000-square-foot WeWork will be the anchor tenant of the $300 million redevelopment co-owned by Boston Properties in the Brooklyn Navy Yard. Plans are afoot for another partnership in San Francisco and perhaps Boston down the road.
WeWork’s founders have been content to stay quiet about their story until now, swearing investors to secrecy. No longer. Over the next 12 months the company expects to triple its membership from 14,000 to 46,000 and expand to 60 locations from 21 today and 9 just a year ago. WeWork’s first location four years ago was just 3,000 square feet in SoHo with creaky floorboards and walls power-washed by its founders. Now WeWork is the fastest-growing lessee of new office space in New York and next year will become the fastest-growing lessee of new space in America as it spreads to cities such as Austin and Chicago, not to mention London, Amsterdam and Tel Aviv.
WeWork will gross an estimated $150 million this year with operating margins of 30%. Current plans will push revenue to more than $400 million next year. In February JPMorgan led a massive (and secret) $150 million investment in the company along with the Harvard Corp., Zuckerman and Benchmark. The deal valued WeWork at $1.5 billion. The founders suspect they will be out raising another round next year that could easily fetch a valuation north of $6 billion. If that comes to fruition, Neumann and McKelvey, who each own an estimated 20%, would be paper billionaires.
WeWork is the leader, by far, in a surging co-working space movement. Some 5,900 shared office operations dot the globe today, compared with 300 five years ago, according to Deskmag.com, a site dedicated to tracking co-working trends. Back then there were fewer than 10,000 people working in such locations worldwide. Today that number is closer to 260,000. Niches have begun appearing: Grind caters to repeat founders and veteran professionals. Hera Hub runs three locations in California just for female entrepreneurs. “People want less stodgy offices,” says Julien Smith, CEO of Breather, a startup that takes flexible space to its extreme, offering private office rentals by the hour to members constantly on the go.
WeWork members freely acknowledge the space is scandalously priced per square foot: $350 a month for a desk and $650 per person for 64 square feet per office. But when WeWork opened its latest building in London’s South End, it was 80% full at launch and like the rest will be at near capacity in just a couple months. That’s because members can save hundreds per month when you factor in included services such as security, reception, broadband, printing–and fewer headaches.
But the real perk is having other people around. WeWorkers network at weekly bagel-and-mimosa parties, where they might find a software developer to produce an app for them. Members pitch their ideas at informal demo days and get free advice during office hours from willing outside partners like ad agency Wieden+Kennedy. Handshake agreements and job referrals are made over the wagging tails of members’ dogs.
“Other offices are just depressing compared to here,” says Nicole Halmi of Neon, an image-selection platform in the WeWork Tenderloin location in San Francisco. “The old model of office space is dead,” adds startup veteran Gary Mendel, who runs Yopine from a WeWork in the renovated Wonder Bread factory in Washington, D.C.
City governments are all-in on the benefits that such spaces can bring to the local economy. In San Francisco Mayor Ed Lee rerouted police patrols and opened a precinct outpost in the ragged Tenderloin district to keep the WeWork members there safe. Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel insisted on personally showing Neumann his unannounced plans for new bike paths and other startup-friendly projects to convince WeWork to move to the West Loop. New Boston Mayor Martin J. Walsh chose the new WeWork as the location for one of his first public speeches after taking office. “This is somewhat new to Boston, the innovation economy, but as more and more people see the type of idea of WeWork, more people will get interested in starting companies,” says Walsh.
“WeWork plays both sides of the coin,” says James B. Lee, Jr., the famed investor and JPMorgan Chase vice chairman who has guided the public offerings of Facebook, Alibaba and General Motors. “Institutions have space that young entrepreneurs could use, but they want to start their own business and cut their own trail. WeWork gives them a home and says, ‘We want you here, we will help you and build you.’ ”
Neumann and McKelvey, who still interview every new employee to make sure they don’t see WeWork as just another real estate play, come by their fanaticism for the power of “we” honestly. The two grew up thousands of miles apart but in their own types of communes and without fathers around. Neumann grew up the son of an Israeli single-mother doctor. He spent two early years learning English when his mom was a resident at an Indianapolis hospital. They returned to Israel and moved into the Kibbutz Nirim near the Gaza Strip. All the children lived together in their own dorm, apart from the parents. He and his little sister, Adi, learned community the hard way, as the tribal kids of the kibbutz shunned Neumann’s family for months. “That was the hardest group I ever had to enter in my life,” he says.
Severely dyslexic and an indifferent student, Neumann found acceptance as an expert windsurfer and ringleader for unapproved extracurricular activities. When it came time for mandatory military service, Neumann says he was among the slowest of the thousands of candidates for the elite naval officers’ school, many of whom had trained for their tryout camp for weeks. When the team-building missions came around, Neumann began to take charge. His was one of the last names to be called when the navy picked its 600-member class. He finished third and left the navy after five years of service.
McKelvey grew up one of six kids in a five-mother collective in Eugene, Ore. They were happy and lived simply on gardening and food stamps. Tang, with its forbidden artificial chemicals, was a special Christmas treat. “Looking back, we grew up poor, but living it then we never knew,” says McKelvey’s commune “sister” Chia O’Keefe, an early WeWork’s employee and now head of innovation.
McKelvey was a talented student, but school bored him easily. What he loved was thinking about ways to revive all the empty storefronts and closed buildings in his depressed hometown. His favorite was Lazar’s Bazar, an ugly duckling that stayed open selling a hodgepodge of items as neighbors came and went. McKelvey saved pocket change for weeks to finally buy a $7 silk skinny tie. “It was the 1980s,” he shrugs today.
After playing basketball at the University of Oregon (and earning his architecture degree), he jumped into the 1990s dot-com boom, starting a website that connected Japanese and English pen pals. Eventually he landed a job with an architecture firm in Brooklyn.
Neumann, meanwhile, had followed his sister, Adi, a Miss Teen Israel, to New York City to pursue her modeling career. He spent the next five years staying at her apartment while taking business classes at Baruch College and managing her six-figure income. Neumann tried several ventures, including selling baby overalls with built-in knee pads (a major flop). He found more success with Egg Baby, an online store for high-end baby clothes.
McKelvey and Neumann struck up a friendship at a party. Neumann asked McKelvey to design his new office space. McKelvey persuaded him to move it to Brooklyn’s Dumbo neighborhood. Their first inkling that they could make money selling shared office space came in January 2008, when Neumann began renting out a corner of his office to someone he found on Craigslist to cut costs. Weeks later Neumann’s landlord, Joshua Guttman, took him through an empty building he had just bought down the street. He was going to charge $1 per square foot for each 5,000-square-foot floor. Neumann said, “I got a better idea. Let me take over one of the floors. I’ll split it up into 15 offices, charge $1,000 each. We’ll make $15,000 a month on this floor–you can take $7,500, we’ll pay the receptionist $2,500, and I’ll keep whatever profit is left.”
Neumann told McKelvey about the idea that afternoon. A night owl, McKelvey came back the next morning with a name, a logo and a working website. The space would be called Green Desk, and it would be eco-friendly with free-trade coffee and cleaning detergent from Seventh Generation. “It seemed so obvious to us,” McKelvey says. “What was out there for office space was not good–it sucked.” Guttman finally agreed, with one condition: They save even more on operations by repeating the model on every floor.
Neumann kept operating Egg Baby as Green Desk took shape. McKelvey quit his job to renovate the building with help from Neumann’s filmmaker wife, Rebekah Paltrow Neumann (she’s a cousin of the actress). He spent his weekends driving to Ikea to fill up his Zipcar with butcher blocks to create office tables. As the deadline for their first move-in neared in 2008, the economy crashed. Guttman told them the jig was up. “He said, ‘I’m not mad at you guys, but this business is going to fail. In a down economy people don’t rent,’ ” says Neumann.
Just the opposite happened. They filled Green Desk with a mere seven Craigslist ads and word of mouth, with tenants ranging from a private equity shop to blogging website Gothamist. But Green Desk was much closer to an executive suite rental company like $2 billion (market cap) Regus than WeWork would become. It didn’t have the communal open spaces or room for programming that the founders would have liked. “We had aspirations for a global brand,” Neumann says. That would mean designing different layouts for each location and spending much more capital on events and amenities. According to Neumann, Guttman preferred to replicate the model that had already worked in more locations in Brooklyn–and it would, with seven locations today. Just not with Neumann and McKelvey on board.
The founders sold to Guttman at a $3 million valuation that netted them $300,000 in initial cash and the rest in gradual payments they’d live off of for the next two years. The lump sum went straight into a deposit for a new location in SoHo built on their community model, along with whatever they could scrounge from credit cards and friends. Israeli friends of Adam’s received free plane tickets to spend two weeks at his apartment and ended up slinging drywall and lumber. “They thought they were coming for fun, and they worked seven days a week,” says Neumann. By February 2010, just one month after launch, WeWork turned its first profit and has never stopped.
An early investor, developer Jack Schreiber, identified their second location, a cheap space across from the Empire State Building owned by three Persian brothers. But the place needed $1 million in work, money that WeWork didn’t have. Schreiber told Neumann that the brothers could be swayed if he won over the one who lived in New York before his relatives outside the country could find out.
“We sat down in the lounge at the SoHo WeWork, and he was very excited,” Neumann remembers. The Israeli and Iranian talked for hours and polished off half a bottle of whiskey, Neumann says. The brother left with a signed contract and a hazy memory. Neumann knew he would come back the next day saying his family wasn’t comfortable, and he did. “So I said, ‘I understood that Persians were men of their word.’ ” That was mostly all it took. WeWork finished preparing their first floor in the building in just 29 days.
Three more locations went up in 2012, by which time WeWork had caught the attention of Benchmark, the media-shy venture firm that had backed eBay, Twitter and Uber. Benchmark had never backed a real estate play, so a founding partner, Bruce Dunlevie, flew out to New York to see why these spaces were so different. “It reminded me a lot of eBay when I met them in 1997,” the investor says. “There was something going on at both that you couldn’t quite put your finger on.” Benchmark’s round valued the company at about $100 million, a figure that would shoot up to $450 million in 2013 when investment bank Jefferies came onboard, says Neumann. JPMorgan passed, but it would change its tune.
It’s possible to out-perk WeWork. A high-end competitor in New York, NeueHouse, co-owned by Joshua Abram and Alan Murray, has a small broadcast studio for members and a café in its New York location, with plans to open a full-service restaurant in its upcoming Los Angeles building. But NeueHouse is growing more slowly and deliberately, with plans for 20 locations by 2020. WeWork, meanwhile, is moving fast, going big and trying to learn from each building and each deal. Neumann can come across as grandiose in his pitch meetings and probably turned off a lot of developers in the early days.
“It took us a little bit to get on the same page. My first impression was they had very big ambition, but I wanted to make sure there was enough substance behind it,” says Jared Kushner, the scion of a big New York real estate family and an advisor to many startups in his brother Josh’s venture portfolio. Kushner has heard plenty of bluster. But then he sat down with McKelvey, who spent 30 minutes arguing about which coffee shop would be right for Kushner’s new $375 million complex in Brooklyn’s Dumbo district. WeWork won a prize spot as one of the project’s two anchor tenants, along with online crafts market Etsy, taking an entire building for itself. “They’ve built a good mousetrap to capture this market trend,” Kushner says. “I capitulated.”
WeWork prefers to work with new developments or in gentrifying or distressed neighborhoods, where WeWork can get space at a standard anchor-tenant discount of about 10%. Even if WeWork drives a hard bargain, its presence raises values of adjacent floors and buildings in the neighborhood. “They’re not stepping on our toes,” says Bill Rudin, whose Rudin Management is also in on the Navy Yard project and one other WeWork location on Wall Street.
WeWork’s biggest risk, founders and investors agree, is in over-extending itself. It’s at a manageable enough size that it can tend to its brand and maintain high levels of customer service. Hire the wrong community managers or automate too much and broken elevators or other snafus won’t be forgiven with free doughnuts. The former CEO of Coach is now a full-time advisor, helping the founders maintain their culture in the midst of rapid growth. New CFO Michael Gross, the former CEO of Morgans Hotel Group, brings experience at creating a hip and hospitable vibe while staying asset-light and within budget. But even they don’t know if WeWork will go over in smaller towns like Cincinnati or Bruges once it reaches the top 25 cities in the U.S. and top dozen in Europe.
Some Silicon Valley investors are skeptical that its economics can survive the inevitable real estate slump. WeWork is charging high per-square-foot prices but is also locking itself into long-term leases at today’s record rents. One investor who passed on the company was concerned not by its high valuation but by the prospect of a tenant exodus amid a recession or cheaper competition.
Neumann has heard that one before. His experience with Green Desk proved that co-working spaces are in even hotter demand when budgets tighten. WeWork’s own rental agreements with property managers can survive in a city like New York, he argues, unless rents hit unprecedented lows, and even then WeWork has millions in equity and operating cash flow that can help it weather a down cycle (and that’s without jacking up member rates).
WeWork’s member base is quite stable, and 28% of its revenue comes from smaller members who upgrade as bigger members graduate to their own spaces or move into larger, newer WeWorks. “I get so much business from being here that they could double my rent and I would still come out ahead,” says Jonathan Smalley, CEO of Brilliant Collaborations, a creative agency and a member at the Wonder Bread WeWork.
India’s existing milk delivery system is haphazardly organized and has issues around quality. Government reports suggest that as much as 68% of milk is ‘tainted.’ Typically, delivery people, whose job is extra to their daytime employment, will water their milk down in order to make greater income from their lot. Reports also suggest that to mask coloration and make their milk appear pure, they also add a range of things including detergent, caustic soda, glucose, white paint and refined oil. Now, Supr Daily is a Mumbai based startup that has digitised milk delivery.
Supr Daily delivers fresh milk to customers directly from farms, with zero additives. It works using a mobile app and WhatsApp account, making communicating with the milkman easier. There is even a vacation setting. The company also offers some everyday goods like bread, eggs, butter and coconut milk for the convenience of their customers. Currently available in 15 neighborhoods in Mumbai, Supr Daily has completed more than 500,000 deliveries over the last year.
CEO and founder, Puneet Kumar, reports that 90% of customers are repeat purchasers and it’s not hard to see why. The startup has reduced the price of delivery with many saving as much as 30-40% on purchases, and the quality of milk is significantly better because Supr Daily works directly with milk farms. The company plans to cover the entire city before the end of 2017, moving on to other tier-one cities in India after that. Milk delivery is ubiquitous across homes and offices in Indian cities, with the market worth an estimated USD 13 billion.
TechCrunch recently added to the story, with this extract:
Getting product lock-in is key in the world of startups. Your app, service or products needs a hook that brings your users back time and time again. How about a startup that hangs its hook on daily milk deliveries?
Supr Daily is that startup. Its is currently taking part in the latest program at Y Combinator, from where CEO Puneet Kumar explained more about what the Mumbai-based startup does.
The prime mission, Kumar said, is to digitize India’s existing milk delivery system, which is not only haphazardly organized but also has issues around quality. Government reports suggest that as much as 68 percent of milk is ‘tainted.’ Typically, delivery people — whose job is extra to their daytime employment — will water their milk down in order to get more bags (and income) for their lot. To mask coloration and make their milk appear pure, they’ll add a range of things including detergent, caustic soda, glucose, white paint and refined oil, according to a Times Internet report.
There are test kits to measure the purity of delivered milk, but Kumar and his team believe in being proactive. Their direct model delivers fresh milk to customers from farms with zero additives.
That’s the primary benefit for customers, but the service — which uses mobile apps and a WhatsApp account for orders — is also more organized than communicating with your milkman via notes on your door (if you are away or need more/less than usual).
“There’s no software in this market, leaving consumers to try calling their milkman if they need to change their order,” Kumar said.
Further, it also offers some every day goods like bread, eggs, butter and coconut milk to help keep households organized without requiring regular trips to the shops.
Supr Daily is currently available in 15 neighborhoods in Mumbai, and it completed more than 500,000 deliveries over the last year. Milk makes up 90 percent of its revenue right now, and Kumar said that 90 percent of customers are repeat purchasers.
More convenient and healthy — you’d assume there’s a cost to pay. But Kumar said Supr Daily has reduced the price of delivery to $0.03-$0.04 per delivery on its service, down from a roughly $0.05 standard that people are accustomed to paying for more traditional delivery. That’s because it is able to plan its routes, work directly with milk farms and generally manage the process infinite times more efficiently than past times.
“It’s sometimes lower but never higher,” Kumar explained. “In some cases people have saved 30-40 percent.”
The company currently covers around 15 percent of Mumbai, according to Kumar’s estimates, and he hopes to expand neighborhood by neighborhood to cover the entire city before the end of 2017. After that, and once the economics of the model are proven, Supr Daily will look to other tier-one cities in India.
Milk is a low cost item, but delivery is near ubiquitous across homes and offices in Indian cities that there is quite a market at scale. Kumar, who started Supr Daily with fellow IIT Bombay graduate Shreyas Nagdawane, said he believes the market in India’s top ten cities is $13 billion, with Bombay alone accounting for around $1.5 billion.
“We have been conscious [with the business so far] and want to get the blueprint right first before we expand,” he said. “We know and have pretty good confidence in it.”
As a daily consumable, milk has been a target for other companies but Kumar said he is confident that the ‘milk-first’ approach helps Supr Daily stand out.
“Grocery startups are using milk as an acquisition channel, but their strategy is that they lose on milk and try to win on groceries,” he explained. “We’ve taken a supply chain approach.”
Reflecting on his time in the U.S. at YC, Kumar said the experience has been hugely valuable.
“YC has seen so many companies that advisors are on the dot almost all the time,” he said. “People are genuinely interested in knowing about original problems In india.”
Supr Daily raised a seed funding round from a collection of angel investors in India in December. The founders of e-commerce giant Snapdeal — Kunal Bahl and Rohit Bansal — also made a previous investment.
In 2016, Goldman Sachs launched its first consumer product, a digital lending platform called Marcus that is aimed at helping people get out of debt. Though other fintech companies have forayed into making borrowing money at affordable rates more tenable, none have Goldman’s deep pockets. The financial company went public in 1999 and has weathered several tempests: insider trading, defrauding investors, and contributing to a massive financial crisis. And yet, it’s kicking off 2017 with stock prices nearing pre-crisis heights following the release of Marcus and a no-minimum savings account, making Goldman a formidable new player in the consumer banking market.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFl_4jOVskQ
This is an extract of how Forbes magazine reported the launch of Marcus:
Goldman Sachs, one of the most storied investment banks on Wall Street, is getting into the consumer finance business with the launch of an online lending platform, Marcus.
Named after one of the banks founders, Marcus Goldman, the business will offer unsecured personal loans of up to $30,000 and is targeting prime borrowers who may be looking to consolidate their credit card debt, or those that are frustrated with the fees and complexity of other lenders. The Marcus platform will offer two-to-six-year fixed rate loans at interest rates of between 5.99% to 22.99%, and is being positioned as a consumer friendly lending alternative due to a lack of origination and prepayment fees, flexible payment dates, and overall simplicity.
“For many who manage debt payments on high-interest rate credit cards, a straight-forward personal loan is a better solution,” said Harit Talwar, head of Marcus by Goldman Sachs. “Marcus offers an option for consumers who are searching for a simpler alternative to credit card borrowing, where rates can change and multiple fees can be charged,” Talwar added.
Consumer lending is new territory for Goldman Sachs, but the investment bank believes its strengths in risk management and technology have an application in Main Street finance. This is especially the case as borrowers move their banking to digital-first platforms and begin to adopt new lending models such as marketplace loans.
Goldman also sees an opportunity to enter the market as fintech firms like LendingClub struggle with operational problems and large banks rationalize brick and mortar branch networks. On one hand, Goldman has been on the forefront of this fintech revolution, seeding platforms ranging from Kensho to Symphony and training many of Wall Street’s most successful quantitative traders. But the bank also has a near $900 billion balance sheet from which it can give a lending operation heft versus standalone platforms.
“Digital technology is making large brick and mortar branches questionable… The traditional distribution strengths of of some of the large banks, in my view, have become legacy costs,” Talwar said in a recent podcast detailing Marcus by Goldman Sachs. He noted that new developments in fintech have given lenders the ability to make loans based on formulas and quantitative metrics, instead of qualitative judgement, something that plays into Goldman’s hands.
“Leveraging risk management, data analytics has always been in our DNA.,” Talwar said.
Interestingly, it is Goldman’s decision to convert into a bank holding company in 2008 to stay afloat during the crisis that laid the foundation for its consumer push. As a bank holding company Goldman now holds traditional deposits, some 3% of its balance sheet assets are wealth loans to high net worth customers, and it is regulated alongside the likes of JPMorgan, Wells Fargo, Bank of America and Citibank. Recently, the firm’s been building its consumer services by buying $16 billion in deposits from General Electric and launching an online bank, GS Bank.
Perhaps, Marcus and GS Bank’s crisis-era DNA also speak to the risks that Goldman takes in moving into consumer finance.
As Talwar noted on his podcast, Goldman is one of the most scrutinized financial institutions in the world. Left unsaid is that while Goldman is seen as a blue chip firm across Corporate America, many ordinary Americans see it as the poster-child for Wall Street excess. As such, Talwar says Goldman will grow its lending capabilities in a deliberate and careful way, mindful of the spotlight that the bank faces.
But there seems to be a quiet confidence that Goldman can win over Main Street with consumer friendly features like a lack of fees, and the ability for consistent borrowers to defer payments at no extra cost during a cash crunch. Perhaps, Goldman’s image will also be bolstered if it winds up offering a new standard of service to a wider swath of the economy.
Initially, Marcus will be made available to millions of prospective customers in an email campaign. Then the bank will make a broader rollout. The tagline for Goldman is that consumer lending will be a startup franchise within the iconic firm.
“Marcus by Goldman Sachs is a new business that benefits from the firm’s 147-year history of financial expertise, risk management and customer service,” the bank proclaims.